AI Provider Assessment Template - WiseRighteous Network

Appendix E — AI Provider Assessment Template

This template provides a structured framework for assessing the righteousness of AI platform and service delivery practices using the AI Provider Righteousness Index (RI‑P) . It evaluates providers across the Five Pillars of AI Righteousness and provides actionable insights for improvement.

Instructions: For each item, assess the AI provider or platform using the following scale:

✅ Yes — Fully implemented and consistently practiced
⚠️ Partial — Partially implemented or inconsistent
❌ No — Not implemented or not yet addressed
N/A — Not applicable to this provider context

Assessment Overview

Field	Details
Assessment Date	___
Assessor Name	___
Assessor Role	___
Assessor Organization	___
AI Provider/Platform	___
RI‑P Version	1.0
Organization	___
Assessment Type	Initial / Follow-up
Assessment Scope	___
Assessment Context	___

Pillar 1: Integrity — Truthful and Transparent Service Delivery

Integrity requires that AI providers deliver truthful, transparent, and non‑deceptive services.

Section 1.1: Service Transparency

#	Assessment Item	Yes	Partial	No	N/A
1.1.1	Are service capabilities and limitations clearly communicated to users?	☐	☐	☐	☐
1.1.2	Are system performance metrics transparently reported?	☐	☐	☐	☐
1.1.3	Are data usage and storage practices clearly disclosed?	☐	☐	☐	☐
1.1.4	Are third‑party integrations and dependencies disclosed?	☐	☐	☐	☐
1.1.5	Is pricing transparent and clearly communicated?	☐	☐	☐	☐

Section 1.2: Truthful Marketing

#	Assessment Item	Yes	Partial	No	N/A
1.2.1	Do marketing claims accurately reflect actual service capabilities?	☐	☐	☐	☐
1.2.2	Are limitations and risks disclosed in marketing materials?	☐	☐	☐	☐
1.2.3	Are testimonials and case studies verifiably authentic?	☐	☐	☐	☐
1.2.4	Is the provider transparent about AI‑generated content?	☐	☐	☐	☐
1.2.5	Is there a process to correct misleading claims?	☐	☐	☐	☐

Section 1.3: No Deception

#	Assessment Item	Yes	Partial	No	N/A
1.3.1	Are users clearly informed when interacting with AI systems?	☐	☐	☐	☐
1.3.2	Does the provider avoid deceptive design patterns (dark patterns)?	☐	☐	☐	☐
1.3.3	Is there a process for detecting and correcting deception?	☐	☐	☐	☐
1.3.4	Are partners and vendors vetted for deceptive practices?	☐	☐	☐	☐
1.3.5	Is there a mechanism for users to report deceptive behavior?	☐	☐	☐	☐

Pillar 2: Justice — Equitable Service Delivery

Justice requires that AI providers deliver services fairly, without discrimination, and with respect for human dignity.

Section 2.1: Equitable Access

#	Assessment Item	Yes	Partial	No	N/A
2.1.1	Is service access equitable across different user groups?	☐	☐	☐	☐
2.1.2	Are accessibility features available for users with disabilities?	☐	☐	☐	☐
2.1.3	Is pricing structured to enable equitable access?	☐	☐	☐	☐
2.1.4	Are language and cultural barriers addressed?	☐	☐	☐	☐
2.1.5	Is there a process for addressing access disparities?	☐	☐	☐	☐

Section 2.2: Non‑Discrimination

#	Assessment Item	Yes	Partial	No	N/A
2.2.1	Does the service discriminate against protected groups?	☐	☐	☐	☐
2.2.2	Are bias tests conducted on service outputs?	☐	☐	☐	☐
2.2.3	Are bias mitigation strategies implemented?	☐	☐	☐	☐
2.2.4	Is discrimination monitoring in place?	☐	☐	☐	☐
2.2.5	Is there a process for addressing discrimination complaints?	☐	☐	☐	☐

Section 2.3: Respect for Dignity

#	Assessment Item	Yes	Partial	No	N/A
2.3.1	Does the service respect user privacy and autonomy?	☐	☐	☐	☐
2.3.2	Is user consent obtained and respected?	☐	☐	☐	☐
2.3.3	Is user data protected from misuse?	☐	☐	☐	☐
2.3.4	Are user rights (access, correction, deletion) supported?	☐	☐	☐	☐
2.3.5	Is there a process for addressing dignity concerns?	☐	☐	☐	☐

Pillar 3: Stewardship — Responsible Platform Governance

Stewardship requires that AI providers govern their platforms with care, accountability, and oversight.

Section 3.1: Platform Governance

#	Assessment Item	Yes	Partial	No	N/A
3.1.1	Are there clear governance structures for platform operation?	☐	☐	☐	☐
3.1.2	Are roles and responsibilities clearly defined?	☐	☐	☐	☐
3.1.3	Is there an AI ethics or governance committee?	☐	☐	☐	☐
3.1.4	Are governance policies documented and accessible?	☐	☐	☐	☐
3.1.5	Is governance reviewed and updated regularly?	☐	☐	☐	☐

Section 3.2: User Protection

#	Assessment Item	Yes	Partial	No	N/A
3.2.1	Are users protected from harm through the service?	☐	☐	☐	☐
3.2.2	Are privacy protections in place and enforced?	☐	☐	☐	☐
3.2.3	Is there a data breach response plan?	☐	☐	☐	☐
3.2.4	Is there a mechanism for reporting abuse or concerns?	☐	☐	☐	☐
3.2.5	Are user complaints investigated and addressed?	☐	☐	☐	☐

Section 3.3: Risk Management

#	Assessment Item	Yes	Partial	No	N/A
3.3.1	Are platform risks identified and assessed?	☐	☐	☐	☐
3.3.2	Is there a risk management process?	☐	☐	☐	☐
3.3.3	Are risks monitored and reviewed regularly?	☐	☐	☐	☐
3.3.4	Are risk mitigation strategies implemented?	☐	☐	☐	☐
3.3.5	Are emerging risks proactively identified?	☐	☐	☐	☐

Pillar 4: Wisdom — Prudent Service Delivery

Wisdom requires that AI providers make wise decisions, anticipate consequences, and exercise sound judgment.

Section 4.1: Service Robustness

#	Assessment Item	Yes	Partial	No	N/A
4.1.1	Is the service designed with appropriate safeguards?	☐	☐	☐	☐
4.1.2	Are contingency plans in place for service disruptions?	☐	☐	☐	☐
4.1.3	Are backup systems and redundancy in place?	☐	☐	☐	☐
4.1.4	Is service resilience tested regularly?	☐	☐	☐	☐
4.1.5	Are lessons learned from incidents incorporated?	☐	☐	☐	☐

Section 4.2: Continuous Improvement

#	Assessment Item	Yes	Partial	No	N/A
4.2.1	Is the service regularly reviewed and improved?	☐	☐	☐	☐
4.2.2	Are user feedback mechanisms in place?	☐	☐	☐	☐
4.2.3	Is performance data collected and analyzed?	☐	☐	☐	☐
4.2.4	Are improvement priorities identified and acted upon?	☐	☐	☐	☐
4.2.5	Is continuous improvement documented?	☐	☐	☐	☐

Section 4.3: Long-Term Thinking

#	Assessment Item	Yes	Partial	No	N/A
4.3.1	Are long-term implications of service decisions considered?	☐	☐	☐	☐
4.3.2	Is the service designed for future adaptability?	☐	☐	☐	☐
4.3.3	Are sustainability considerations in place?	☐	☐	☐	☐
4.3.4	Are future regulatory changes anticipated?	☐	☐	☐	☐
4.3.5	Is the service aligned with long‑term societal goals?	☐	☐	☐	☐

Pillar 5: Beneficence — Service for Human Flourishing

Beneficence requires that AI providers actively promote human and environmental well‑being.

Section 5.1: Well‑Being Contribution

#	Assessment Item	Yes	Partial	No	N/A
5.1.1	Does the service contribute to user and societal well‑being?	☐	☐	☐	☐
5.1.2	Are positive societal impacts identified and measured?	☐	☐	☐	☐
5.1.3	Is there a process for maximizing positive impact?	☐	☐	☐	☐
5.1.4	Are vulnerable users protected from harm?	☐	☐	☐	☐
5.1.5	Are well‑being outcomes documented and shared?	☐	☐	☐	☐

Section 5.2: Environmental Stewardship

#	Assessment Item	Yes	Partial	No	N/A
5.2.1	Is the environmental impact of the service managed?	☐	☐	☐	☐
5.2.2	Are energy‑efficient practices in place?	☐	☐	☐	☐
5.2.3	Is the environmental footprint measured and reported?	☐	☐	☐	☐
5.2.4	Are environmental sustainability goals in place?	☐	☐	☐	☐
5.2.5	Is environmental performance monitored and improved?	☐	☐	☐	☐

Section 5.3: Common Good

#	Assessment Item	Yes	Partial	No	N/A
5.3.1	Does the service serve the broader public interest?	☐	☐	☐	☐
5.3.2	Is the service accessible to diverse communities?	☐	☐	☐	☐
5.3.3	Is there a commitment to social responsibility?	☐	☐	☐	☐
5.3.4	Are community benefits identified and delivered?	☐	☐	☐	☐
5.3.5	Is there stakeholder engagement for the common good?	☐	☐	☐	☐

RI‑P Score Summary

Score Calculation

Pillar	Total Items	Yes	Partial	No	Score (%)
Integrity	15	___	___	___	___%
Justice	15	___	___	___	___%
Stewardship	15	___	___	___	___%
Wisdom	15	___	___	___	___%
Beneficence	15	___	___	___	___%
RI‑P Total	75	___	___	___	___%

Score Interpretation

Score Range	Rating	Description
80–100%	Righteous	Exemplary provider practices; righteousness is embedded in service delivery
60–79%	Proficient	Solid provider practices; righteousness is considered but could be strengthened
40–59%	Developing	Foundational practices in place; significant improvement opportunities exist
20–39%	Emerging	Basic awareness exists; provider practices need substantial improvement
0–19%	Unassessed	No systematic righteousness assessment has been conducted

Action Plan

Pillar	Priority Gaps	Recommended Actions	Owner	Target Date	Status
Integrity
Justice
Stewardship
Wisdom
Beneficence

Strengths and Opportunities

Key Strengths:

Improvement Opportunities:

Assessment Notes

Observations:

Recommendations:

Next Steps

Step	Action	Owner	Timeline
1	Review assessment findings with provider team
2	Prioritize action items
3	Assign owners and target dates
4	Implement improvements
5	Schedule follow‑up assessment

Sign‑Off

Role	Name	Signature	Date
Assessor
Provider Lead
Governance Lead